A Formal Logical Analysis of Causal Relations
نویسنده
چکیده
A Formal Logical Analysis of Causal Relations Summary Causal relations of various kinds are a pervasive feature of human language and theorising about the world. Despite this, the specification of a satisfactory general analysis of causal relations has long proved difficult. The research described in this thesis is an attempt to provide a formal logical theory of causal relations, in a broad sense of 'causal', which includes various atemporal explanatory and functional relations, in addition to causation between temporally ordered events; and which involves not only necessity associated with physical laws, but also necessity associated with laws and constraints of various other types. The key idea which motivates the analysis is that many types of causal relation have in common certain underlying abstract properties, regardless of the nature of the participants involved. These properties can be expressed via an axiomatisation, initially viewed as applicable to 'event causation', but subsequently re-interpreted in a more abstract and general way. Given the wide variety of models for the axioms, there are not likely to be powerful general methods for computing the causal relationships defined: instead it is likely to be more productive to use methods tailored to particular models. N.B. This a slightly revised version of the original thesis. Produced using the L A T E X 2 ε typesetting package, it incorporates numerous minor changes and corrections , and a different page numbering to the original thesis (available from
منابع مشابه
Arbitrary Relations in Formal Concept Analysis and Logical Information Systems
A logical view of formal concept analysis considers attributes of a formal context as unary predicates. In a first part, we propose an augmented definition that handles binary relations between objects. A Galois connection is defined on augmented contexts. It represents concept inheritance as usual, but also relations between concepts. As usual, labeling operators are also defined. In particula...
متن کاملLogical and Probabilistic Reasoning to Support Information Analysis in Uncertain Domains
Formal logical tools are able to provide some amount of reasoning support for information analysis, but are unable to represent uncertainty. Bayesian network tools represent probabilistic and causal information, but in the worst case scale as poorly as some formal logical systems and require specialized expertise to use effectively. We describe a framework for systems that incorporate the advan...
متن کاملLogical Implication and Causal Dependency
Suppose that whenever event x occurs, a second event y must subsequently occur. We say that x “causes” y, or y is causally dependent on x. Deterministic causality abounds in software where execution of one routine can necessarily force execution of a subsequent subroutine. Discovery of such causal dependencies can be an important step to understanding the structure of undocumented, legacy code....
متن کاملRefining the Meaning of Sense Labels in PDTB: "Concession"
The most recent release of PDTB 2.0 contains annotations of senses of connectives. The PDTB 2.0 manual describes the hierarchical set of senses used in the annotation and offers rough semantic descriptions of each label. In this paper, we refine the semantics of concession substantially and offer a formal description of concessive relations and the associated inferences drawn by the reader, uti...
متن کاملKnowledge , Causality and Temporal Representation
In this paper, a formal semantic account of the simple past tense in text is ooered. The contributions to the interpretation of text made by the text's syntactic structure, semantic content, aspectual classiication, world knowledge of the causal relations between events, and Gricean pragmatic maxims are all represented within a single logical framework. This feature of the theory gives rise to ...
متن کامل